Wiki related questions |
Wiki related questions |
28 Feb 2013, 7:58
Post
#1
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1080 Joined: 24 December 2011 Member No.: 8905 Loves guessing games |
Okay so got some questions about the wiki. Could use some opinions/directions on these,
Should all the Fortification add-ons be on the same page like this or do they look too crowded and some of them need separate pages? Fortification Does the Troop Crawler page need an overhaul after the last patch or is it too early for it? Troop Crawler Is it okay to update pages based on the info in this thread? http://forums.swr-productions.com/index.php?showtopic=4439 What would be a suitable name for the category of primary resource gatherers like Osprey, secondary gatherers like Hackers or resource gatherers in general? |
|
|
1 Mar 2013, 20:26
Post
#2
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1080 Joined: 24 December 2011 Member No.: 8905 Loves guessing games |
The C&C RA3 Paradox mod has a very well-developed wiki. You could probably get inspired by their design. They use a rather clever system to describe the relationships between the factions: the ROTR wiki needs something similar IMHO. Making something like the Paradox mod wiki would be awesome but right now the ROTR wiki needs to focus on the basics. I've already said this before and to repeat myself but it's all going to a dead end unless some members help out by writing the usage, counters, pros, cons etc of the units. A lot of the pages need these basic stuff added. Poor GLA; they're like the little kid in school who nobody liked yet were hiding great power. More like the kid who was a dick and went around causing everyone trouble and now they all hate him. BTW is it okay to add the Generals pages to the Lore category? This post has been edited by SpiralSpectre: 1 Mar 2013, 20:27 |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17 June 2024 - 8:13 |