Wiki related questions |
Wiki related questions |
28 Feb 2013, 7:58
Post
#1
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1080 Joined: 24 December 2011 Member No.: 8905 Loves guessing games |
Okay so got some questions about the wiki. Could use some opinions/directions on these,
Should all the Fortification add-ons be on the same page like this or do they look too crowded and some of them need separate pages? Fortification Does the Troop Crawler page need an overhaul after the last patch or is it too early for it? Troop Crawler Is it okay to update pages based on the info in this thread? http://forums.swr-productions.com/index.php?showtopic=4439 What would be a suitable name for the category of primary resource gatherers like Osprey, secondary gatherers like Hackers or resource gatherers in general? |
|
|
13 Mar 2013, 17:01
Post
#2
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 20 Joined: 9 December 2012 Member No.: 9530 |
But does the name not "describe them" specifically enough, while isn't having the term in the title and Unitbox template redundant? [Again, couldn't the descriptor term be captioned under the unit's render?]
It would also seem that using such in the "Role" section might also not do the best job at defining the unit, as to say that a unit is a "Helicopter Gunship" doesn't mean the same for every Gunship [the Comanche compared to the Viper for example, so far the only thing both have in common is anti-personal/ anti-light vehicle capability). Thus I am for only having unit's name in the title, in my opinion that makes category pages cleaner. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22 June 2024 - 21:12 |