Wiki related questions |
Wiki related questions |
28 Feb 2013, 7:58
Post
#1
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1080 Joined: 24 December 2011 Member No.: 8905 Loves guessing games |
Okay so got some questions about the wiki. Could use some opinions/directions on these,
Should all the Fortification add-ons be on the same page like this or do they look too crowded and some of them need separate pages? Fortification Does the Troop Crawler page need an overhaul after the last patch or is it too early for it? Troop Crawler Is it okay to update pages based on the info in this thread? http://forums.swr-productions.com/index.php?showtopic=4439 What would be a suitable name for the category of primary resource gatherers like Osprey, secondary gatherers like Hackers or resource gatherers in general? |
|
|
15 Mar 2013, 9:47
Post
#2
|
|
Orcinius Genocidalus Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 11 July 2012 From: North Vancouver Member No.: 9223 No, you move. |
Calling them by "Anti-infantry" or such gets overly pointless.
They're helicopter gunships. it means they shoot missiles and stuff. We don't need overly pointless terms like Anti-infantry. It already has the info right when we play when it says "Strong against X" and "Weak against Y" -------------------- |
|
|
15 Mar 2013, 19:07
Post
#3
|
|
Comrade Bear Group: Dev. Team Posts: 954 Joined: 3 February 2013 Member No.: 9722 Projects: Deep Impact |
Calling them by "Anti-infantry" or such gets overly pointless. They're helicopter gunships. it means they shoot missiles and stuff. We don't need overly pointless terms like Anti-infantry. It already has the info right when we play when it says "Strong against X" and "Weak against Y" Agree. Put description terms such as MBT in, that's what I'm for. Maybe someone wants to find APCs for a comparison. Description terms make it easier to find the vehicles you want. -------------------- Your feeling of helplessness is your best friend, savage.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20 June 2024 - 1:54 |