Eca vs Usa, discussion |
Eca vs Usa, discussion |
1 Sep 2016, 2:26
Post
#26
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 683 Joined: 2 April 2015 Member No.: 10992 |
now ur just spazzing out. chill
QUOTE ECA OP , Russia OP , USA OP , GLA OP , CHINA BUFFS PLEASE oh real mature |
|
|
1 Sep 2016, 8:23
Post
#27
|
|
Group: Tester Posts: 1833 Joined: 29 May 2012 Member No.: 9155 |
The stuffs we're seeing now, most of them shouldn't have exist to begin with if balance was the main focus. It's impossible to have good balance with an incomplete game. At least 2.0 have things planned way ahead. Moreso, we have massive overbloat of general unique features for some factions, and lack of general-unique features for other factions. Combined with general policy to avoid "let's nerf this now and then buff it again in 2.0" decisions on large scale. All of that makes things much harder for the balancing. <...>This is why I keep telling you to wait for 2.0 to get a better game. However that doesn't mean 1.87 is gonna be unbalanced, in fact I think it's gonna be the most balanced version that's released thus far, (we're so close). It isn't about being lazy, it's about changing things that do not contradict future plans. We were "so close". Though, I'm optimistic on the remaining amount of balance-related work required, even taking into account certain recent developments. (no people, don't take my or Mizo's words as "1.87 is close" hype, there're other matters that are considered far more important by DevTeam at current moment.) oh real mature But more relevant than serious 1.86 balance discussions on forums. 1.87 is different, will probably have it's own issues, that would as usual surface during the mass tests (though we really did address alot of them), but is a huge step forward compared to 1.86. And once again, the closer 2.0 is, the more it's getting taken into consideration. This post has been edited by Knjaz.: 1 Sep 2016, 9:11 |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24 April 2024 - 12:16 |