Navy |
  |
Navy |
 2 Dec 2012, 17:45
Post
#1
|
|
  Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 1 December 2012 From: Thailand Member No.: 9517  |
why i get the same unit of USA in a different faction when i capture the naval yard?
|
 |
 
|
|
2 Dec 2012, 18:27
Post
#2
|
|
  Group: Dev. Team Posts: 109 Joined: 26 October 2009 From: United States Member No.: 507 |
The individual navies for each faction have not yet been implemented, so everyone gets the USA navy for the time being.
-------------------- Signatures are overrated :)
|
|
|
|
|
3 Dec 2012, 0:53
Post
#3
|
|
 Officer of the European Continental Army Group: Members Posts: 2351 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: England, Great Britain Member No.: 71 Community Manager at Nexus Mods |
QUOTE (CobraHumvee @ 2 Dec 2012, 17:27)  The individual navies for each faction have not yet been implemented, so everyone gets the USA navy for the time being. Technically it's more of a placeholder navy, USA will get something cooler. --------------------   |
|
|
|
|
3 Dec 2012, 19:35
Post
#4
|
|
 Orcinius Genocidalus Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 11 July 2012 From: North Vancouver Member No.: 9223 No, you move. |
QUOTE Technically it's more of a placeholder navy, USA will get something cooler. 
--------------------  |
|
|
|
|
3 Dec 2012, 22:19
Post
#5
|
|
 Dangerous Eukaryote Group: Members Posts: 868 Joined: 6 June 2012 From: CANADA :D Member No.: 9173 More awesome than an imploding star and a burning car combined |
I was wondering if GLA could possibly get an ability that lets it build a weaker version or "scrap" version of any of the factions' ships?
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
3 Dec 2012, 23:06
Post
#6
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 266 Joined: 9 January 2012 Member No.: 8935 |
Hmm, might be useful. I hope the Russian gets typhoon-class submarines and the Kirov-class missile cruiser (its a battle-cruiser in all terms) for their navy.
|
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 0:13
Post
#7
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 2642 Joined: 18 April 2012 From: Southern Brazil. Member No.: 9084 "No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise." |
QUOTE (Panzer4life @ 3 Dec 2012, 20:06) Hmm, might be useful. I hope the Russian gets typhoon-class submarines and the Kirov-class missile cruiser (its a battle-cruiser in all terms) for their navy. I think the same thing, The Russia need to subs. --------------------  You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction |
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 0:23
Post
#8
|
|
|
Orcinius Genocidalus Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 11 July 2012 From: North Vancouver Member No.: 9223 No, you move. |
And don't forget US carriers!
Hmm, what to do with china? To be honest, they don't have much of a navy right now. -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 0:41
Post
#9
|
|
|
Officer of the European Continental Army Group: Members Posts: 2351 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: England, Great Britain Member No.: 71 Community Manager at Nexus Mods |
AC carriers are a definite no, Drone carriers however may be possible
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 1:44
Post
#10
|
|
|
Orcinius Genocidalus Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 11 July 2012 From: North Vancouver Member No.: 9223 No, you move. |
Carrier with MQ-9 Reapers?
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 3:51
Post
#11
|
|
|
Dangerous Eukaryote Group: Members Posts: 868 Joined: 6 June 2012 From: CANADA :D Member No.: 9173 More awesome than an imploding star and a burning car combined |
I heard that the US navy is planning to field a new kind of UAV for their aircraft carriers. The Northrop Grumman X-48B , but that could turn out to be another ... shudder ... wasp nest. Except this time on steriods :S
QUOTE Hmm, what to do with china? To be honest, they don't have much of a navy right now. hahahaha WRONG!! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-20483716 China gots first aircraft carriers, Biach!! BTW i am chinese so that makes me feel warm inside 
This post has been edited by InsurgentCell: 4 Dec 2012, 4:30 -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 4:03
Post
#12
|
|
 Group: Dev. Team Posts: 838 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: Southeastern USA Member No.: 47 |
MQ-9 Reapers? We can do better. How about X-47C Pegasi, or something even more advanced?
-------------------- "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."-- George S. Patton
 Resquiescat in pace, CommanderJB 1991-2009 |
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 4:52
Post
#13
|
|
 Master of Wreckage  Group: Leader Posts: 2673 Joined: 31 May 2009 From: Dallas TX, USA Member No.: 2 Projects: SWR Productions |
We've got some ideas already, no worries we'll try to do justice to each factions principle designs into their navy
--------------------  SWR Co-Lead | Texture Artist | Modeler | Level Designer | Fan of all things Awesome |
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 8:55
Post
#14
|
|
|
Orcinius Genocidalus Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 11 July 2012 From: North Vancouver Member No.: 9223 No, you move. |
QUOTE China gots first aircraft carriers, Biach!! Yeah, One aircraft carrier they can't man properly without more training and mostly just bought from another country, real awesome eh? I'm chinese-canadian but you don't see me posting about that eh? *Ignores blatant hypocrisy eh?* EDIT: Giant WASPS Oh the tears would taste like maple syrup eh? *Stops saying eh, Eh* This post has been edited by Serialkillerwhale: 4 Dec 2012, 10:29 -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 13:54
Post
#15
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 256 Joined: 21 October 2009 From: Between Europe and Asia. Member No.: 500 |
QUOTE (Serialkillerwhale @ 4 Dec 2012, 15:55) I'm chinese-canadian but you don't see me posting about that eh? I've just seen that...  
|
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 15:23
Post
#16
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 285 Joined: 9 May 2012 Member No.: 9109 |
İt would be cool if the US would have a drone carrier And the ECA that solaris beam tanks weapon on their big ships
-------------------- DOZER move aside !
|
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 16:10
Post
#17
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 8 July 2012 From: Hong Kong Member No.: 9218 Ingenious indeed, but mildly impossible |
Just sayin', China's carrier is only a medium carrier compared to the Large American ones. And they lack in experience and training, a flaw shared in the current PLA air force.
Anyway, back to topic. I have faith that the dev's would come up with brilliant ideas for the faction navies. Still, I think that each navy ships should reflect the tactics of their faction. So, here are some ideas that crossed my head GLA: mobility and stealth, perhaps fast attack boat with RPGs China: napalm, EMP, Nukes. Destroyers armed with these special weapons, a Radar Jammimg Ship? Russia: Overwhelming Firepower. Missile cruiser, RA style dreadnought, subs. USA: Unmanned combat and Air superiority. UAV carrier, Normal carrier. ECA: Artillery and Defence. Good ol' battleships with huge cannons? (On second thought, that seems out of date) |
|
|
|
 4 Dec 2012, 23:03
Post
#18
|
|
|
Dangerous Eukaryote Group: Members Posts: 868 Joined: 6 June 2012 From: CANADA :D Member No.: 9173 More awesome than an imploding star and a burning car combined |
QUOTE (Serialkillerwhale @ 4 Dec 2012, 2:55) Yeah, One aircraft carrier they can't man properly without more training and mostly just bought from another country, real awesome eh? I'm chinese-canadian but you don't see me posting about that eh? *Ignores blatant hypocrisy eh?* I'm chinese canadian and I dont brag about how great the US is and put down my own country 
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 23:09
Post
#19
|
|
  Group: Tester Posts: 1833 Joined: 29 May 2012 Member No.: 9155 |
QUOTE (Serialkillerwhale @ 4 Dec 2012, 1:23) And don't forget US carriers! Hmm, what to do with china? To be honest, they don't have much of a navy right now. Yeah. Made their first ever landing on Carrier a week or two ago, still got a long road to go. And 30 years is definitely enough to for that. This post has been edited by Knjaz.: 4 Dec 2012, 23:12 |
|
|
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 0:56
Post
#20
|
|
|
Dangerous Eukaryote Group: Members Posts: 868 Joined: 6 June 2012 From: CANADA :D Member No.: 9173 More awesome than an imploding star and a burning car combined |
QUOTE (Nonchalant General @ 4 Dec 2012, 10:10) ECA: Artillery and Defence. Good ol' battleships with huge cannons? (On second thought, that seems out of date) Id say that's a great idea. Screw the low techness, it could mount advanced laser guided stabilized cannons 
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 1:07
Post
#21
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 94 Joined: 13 June 2009 Member No.: 146 |
As godawful as Revenge of the Fallen was, I can see the ECA using a railgun-battleship just like in the film, mixed with smaller but more efficient craft overall than Russia/China/USA
|
|
|
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 1:33
Post
#22
|
|
|
Orcinius Genocidalus Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 11 July 2012 From: North Vancouver Member No.: 9223 No, you move. |
QUOTE laser guided Unfortunately, No American stuff QUOTE railgun-battleship Or russian. Rule of CNC, now two factions can use the same stuff no matter how logical it is. QUOTE I'm chinese canadian and I dont brag about how great the US is and put down my own country I'm a comedian, saying eh to the point of getting overused is comedy. That and the ZH ending didn't rub me right (So it's just a really bad freudian excuse) -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 2:45
Post
#23
|
|
|
Dangerous Eukaryote Group: Members Posts: 868 Joined: 6 June 2012 From: CANADA :D Member No.: 9173 More awesome than an imploding star and a burning car combined |
QUOTE Unfortunatly, No American stuff How about just 'guided' cannons =/ QUOTE Or russian. Rule of CNC, now two factions can use the same stuff no matter how logical it is. And railguns are not russian, i dont think... where did you get that idea? QUOTE I'm a comedian, saying eh to the point of getting overused is comedy. I was talking about you putting down the aircraft carrier. I do agree that it that big of an achievement compared to other countries with aircraft carriers, but you didn't really have to ruin it
This post has been edited by InsurgentCell: 5 Dec 2012, 2:46 -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 3:37
Post
#24
|
|
|
Orcinius Genocidalus Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 11 July 2012 From: North Vancouver Member No.: 9223 No, you move. |
QUOTE I was talking about you putting down the aircraft carrier. I do agree that it that big of an achievement compared to other countries with aircraft carriers, but you didn't really have to ruin it Sorry QUOTE And railguns are not russian, i dont think... where did you get that idea? Aleksander (Alexsander? Alexander?) Has one doesn't he? -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 3:43
Post
#25
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2642 Joined: 18 April 2012 From: Southern Brazil. Member No.: 9084 "No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise." |
QUOTE (InsurgentCell @ 4 Dec 2012, 23:45) And railguns are not russian, i dont think... where did you get that idea? The Russia will have this technology in the game, specifically the General Aleksander. BTW: in the introduction of the ROTR you see that said unit over the Russian train, is the Kodiak of Gen Alek equipped with the railgun. 
-------------------- You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction |
|
|
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28 April 2024 - 3:10 |
