IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1.5 Impression, - discuss, post opinions -
Anubis
post 4 Oct 2009, 1:25
Post #26



Group Icon

Group: Project Leader
Posts: 892
Joined: 8 June 2009
From: Cynopolies
Member No.: 97



I don't think balance is needed atm, nor is it the time spent for it. It's not like any of the team members have a job in doing this mod. Spending time on balance means no time for further working on the mod. I doubt the team has 25 hours a day of free time tongue.gif so they can spend it all on balance and modding. Every balance change they make not only requires time to play the game, but also change the code and think of new ways to obtain that balance.
This is not a balance topic, since balance atm is kind of out of the question and simply not worth implementing. RotR at this point is just a single player based beta. Like other said before, what is the point in adding balance since most of the current factions units and defenses will be split arround when the generals factions are released, again considering this is not a job but a free time hobby. The point of this pre 2.0 releases is to give us a taste of what the end result will have in it, not a full working mulltiplayer experience.
So pls, end the balance stuff, and just focus on design/features that you enjoyed or not, because this is the purpose of this topic.

This post has been edited by Anubis: 4 Oct 2009, 1:25
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shiro
post 4 Oct 2009, 1:34
Post #27


Gamer Girl
Group Icon

Group: Legend
Posts: 3808
Joined: 19 June 2009
From: Disboard
Member No.: 182
Friendly Freelancer



Well said Anubis.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Wi-Ta
post 4 Oct 2009, 3:45
Post #28



Group Icon

Group: Legend
Posts: 731
Joined: 31 May 2009
From: EU
Member No.: 8
Projects: SWR Tester
Old sneaky german



QUOTE
The point of this pre 2.0 releases is to give us a taste of what the end result will have in it, not a full working mulltiplayer experience.

For me this hits the nail on the head.


--------------------
QUOTE (NergiZed @ 5 Dec 2010, 18:51) *
Just add some green particle effects and it'll be like X-mas~!

QUOTE (The_Hunter @ 20 Oct 2009, 14:17) *
The ECM effects have a nasty side effect that it makes pilots drunk :P


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Frostyarmy
post 4 Oct 2009, 8:36
Post #29


League is Life
Group Icon

Group: Tester
Posts: 748
Joined: 14 June 2009
From: America
Member No.: 153



We all have are opinions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JJ
post 4 Oct 2009, 10:48
Post #30



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 227
Joined: 7 June 2009
Member No.: 65
Projects: SWR Productions



Exactly, also offline people never truly appreciates balance. Problem with ignoring balance completely is that the multiplayer community is almost non-existent, I myself have not played games with more than 2 players yet since 1.5.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shiro
post 4 Oct 2009, 14:25
Post #31


Gamer Girl
Group Icon

Group: Legend
Posts: 3808
Joined: 19 June 2009
From: Disboard
Member No.: 182
Friendly Freelancer



Maybe you should join some Hamachi rooms^^ I did, and it was a good choice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Razven
post 5 Oct 2009, 4:24
Post #32



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 7 June 2009
From: Hong Kong, China
Member No.: 40
Projects: ROTR Tester



QUOTE (JJ @ 4 Oct 2009, 14:48) *
Exactly, also offline people never truly appreciates balance. Problem with ignoring balance completely is that the multiplayer community is almost non-existent, I myself have not played games with more than 2 players yet since 1.5.


To be honest, I have yet to play a game of the public release version because there doesn't seem to be anyone there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Frostyarmy
post 5 Oct 2009, 4:31
Post #33


League is Life
Group Icon

Group: Tester
Posts: 748
Joined: 14 June 2009
From: America
Member No.: 153



You could always as someone to upload it for you
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrizzAFWX
post 5 Oct 2009, 6:43
Post #34



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 15 June 2009
From: US
Member No.: 160



For those who are having an issue with the F-117 being in the game because the USAF retired it, just follow this scenario (courtesy of AFBlues.com):









Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shiro
post 5 Oct 2009, 16:53
Post #35


Gamer Girl
Group Icon

Group: Legend
Posts: 3808
Joined: 19 June 2009
From: Disboard
Member No.: 182
Friendly Freelancer



Nice comic indeed, explains the whole situation well XD.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wb21
post 5 Oct 2009, 18:00
Post #36


Товарищ
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 650
Joined: 17 June 2009
From: Philippines
Member No.: 175
ex-D' WRTHBRNGR



Agreed, that "retirement" might just be a cover-up...


--------------------

"Not in mood...go away..."
"We are going to have to act, if we want to live in a different world."

Bringing wrath to a forum near you since 2009!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Overdose
post 5 Oct 2009, 20:59
Post #37


Hardly Diplomatic
Group Icon

Group: Legend
Posts: 1468
Joined: 31 May 2009
From: Brazil
Member No.: 4
Projects: Retired



Nice.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Anubis
post 5 Oct 2009, 21:05
Post #38



Group Icon

Group: Project Leader
Posts: 892
Joined: 8 June 2009
From: Cynopolies
Member No.: 97



Right ... they covered up the F117 wich had a few problems in it's stealth systems when deploying weapons and a few others, as well as ageing technology yet they keep the B2 F22 and F35 as close to public view as possible wich are far more advanced and stealthed ( B2 especialy ) than the F117. We are talking about a ancient plane compaired to this new ones. It's like saying the germans told the public the U-boat are retired and replaced by nukesubs, so they can still use the 'secret U-boat armada of death' . The comic is good. The point it brings is ball:@it . It makes no sense in any logical way.

This post has been edited by Anubis: 5 Oct 2009, 21:06
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Overdose
post 5 Oct 2009, 23:27
Post #39


Hardly Diplomatic
Group Icon

Group: Legend
Posts: 1468
Joined: 31 May 2009
From: Brazil
Member No.: 4
Projects: Retired



Its not supposed to. =/


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrizzAFWX
post 6 Oct 2009, 0:54
Post #40



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 15 June 2009
From: US
Member No.: 160



QUOTE (Anubis @ 5 Oct 2009, 13:05) *
Right ... they covered up the F117 wich had a few problems in it's stealth systems when deploying weapons and a few others, as well as ageing technology yet they keep the B2 F22 and F35 as close to public view as possible wich are far more advanced and stealthed ( B2 especialy ) than the F117. We are talking about a ancient plane compaired to this new ones. It's like saying the germans told the public the U-boat are retired and replaced by nukesubs, so they can still use the 'secret U-boat armada of death' . The comic is good. The point it brings is ball:@it . It makes no sense in any logical way.



That's why it's a comic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Anubis
post 6 Oct 2009, 1:32
Post #41



Group Icon

Group: Project Leader
Posts: 892
Joined: 8 June 2009
From: Cynopolies
Member No.: 97



I was not refering to the comic itself when i said it makes no sense, but to the people who actually belived and sustained that the comic offers a true and belivable answer for the continuos use of the nighthawk. Belive it or not, i know what a comic is and is suppose to do tongue.gif .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shiro
post 6 Oct 2009, 22:47
Post #42


Gamer Girl
Group Icon

Group: Legend
Posts: 3808
Joined: 19 June 2009
From: Disboard
Member No.: 182
Friendly Freelancer



Of course the comic is silly and over the top, buth uhm just think about it: all those planes you mentioned, are very avdanced and VERY expensive (and obviously more difficult to produce) than the old F-117. Apart from that, the F-117 is an iconic unit considered 'American' (or so they say).

This post has been edited by KamuiK: 6 Oct 2009, 22:47
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cobretti
post 7 Oct 2009, 8:06
Post #43



Group Icon

Group: Dev. Team
Posts: 838
Joined: 7 June 2009
From: Southeastern USA
Member No.: 47



Actually the F-35 will be less expensive than the F-117, and the last F-117 was built sometime in the late 1980's.


--------------------
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."-- George S. Patton


Resquiescat in pace, CommanderJB 1991-2009
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GrizzAFWX
post 9 Oct 2009, 0:56
Post #44



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 15 June 2009
From: US
Member No.: 160



QUOTE (DerKrieger @ 7 Oct 2009, 0:06) *
Actually the F-35 will be less expensive than the F-117, and the last F-117 was built sometime in the late 1980's.



Development on it actually started in the late 70s. The plane was operational by the mid 80s, and it saw action in Panama in the late 80s.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28 March 2024 - 14:21