Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

SWR Productions Forum _ ShockWave _ GLA buildings

Posted by: wew1994 18 Jun 2009, 20:04

I thought I had read that article once on Fallout about doing that

is this still planned or not?

Posted by: NergiZed 18 Jun 2009, 20:14

You must've been reading the suggestion forums because I don't remember any plans like this.

Posted by: Pickysaurus 18 Jun 2009, 20:19

The Palace is garrisonable and that's annoying enough T.T

Posted by: wew1994 18 Jun 2009, 20:31

QUOTE (NergiZed @ 18 Jun 2009, 18:14) *
You must've been reading the suggestion forums because I don't remember any plans like this.


aah okay, it would have been fun though xD

Posted by: Stinger 18 Jun 2009, 21:22

QUOTE (wew1994 @ 18 Jun 2009, 17:04) *
is this still planned or not?


It was never planned and it isn't something we are going to be doing, either. smile.gif

Posted by: accomplice 18 Jun 2009, 21:50

Palace and vGLA ghetto houses, that's it. Though latter one is as protective as stinger sites are for the stinger troopers smile.gif

Posted by: Chyros 18 Jun 2009, 21:56

It probably has something to do with the alpha version of ZH, in which this was planned. IIRC it has never been on the shw to-do list, though.

Posted by: Thez 18 Jun 2009, 23:25

Although the concept itself is interesting, a Palace is already a major obstacle for any opponent.
Now imagine a turtling GLA player having his Command Center, Arms Dealer and Palace all garrisoned and Fortified, reinforced by Stingers and Tunnels.\
On top of that, Fortified Buildings are very tough to kill, and they leave a GLA hole to boot.
It would be overpowering a faction that already has the best base building and rebuilding capability even more.
As said, an interesting concept, but extremely unbalanced.

Posted by: C.o.m.m.a.n.d.e.r 18 Jun 2009, 23:27

I nvr use the palace garrison as it is i dont see the point in any others having it

Posted by: Lord Atlantis 18 Jun 2009, 23:42

QUOTE (C.o.m.m.a.n.d.e.r @ 18 Jun 2009, 12:27) *
I nvr use the palace garrison as it is i dont see the point in any others having it

Then you are really missing out on one of the best defensive buildings for the GLA matey. Try it out sometime. Its better than any bunker that China can build smile.gif (except for the fortified bunker, that thing can really be only taken down by superweapon strikes.)

Posted by: Shock 19 Jun 2009, 0:17

Using the palace as a defensive building in a compact GLA base is the best thing you can have for GLA when defending. GLA does not have able stationary defenses so if you want to protect your base, the Palace is really a must.

Posted by: wew1994 19 Jun 2009, 0:28

okay, my fault smile.gif

thx guys for answering so quickly

but you must’nt build you palace at your defences, right? . so whats the point than?
or am i wrong I8.gif

Posted by: Stinger 19 Jun 2009, 0:46

The best defense is a good offense, but a well placed Palace can also serve to augment a GLA starting position (which is usually always located at the first Supply Dock).

Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)