IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5  
Closed TopicStart new topic
Rise of the Reds Update: Swamped
Planardweller
post 4 Dec 2012, 18:30
Post #101



Group Icon

Group: Tester
Posts: 431
Joined: 5 November 2012
From: Ukraine, Kyiv
Member No.: 9425



QUOTE (MR.Kim @ 4 Dec 2012, 18:53) *
Considering that is not "Venom" I8.gif

From I what heard, Venom is some type of vechile.

From "Rise of the Reds Update: Eisenfresser"
The part about European R&D compound:
The threat of the Russian invasion has forced the ECA to tighten their schedules and send these rare prototypes into combat. Only little is currently known about their exact nature besides sketchy rumours, ranging from a super-heavy 'Manticore' tank over an armoured exo-skeleton dubbed the 'Venom' to what appears to a militarised version of an ESA orbital payload delivery mechanism codenamed 'Pandora'.

That the basis for my speculation.
What do you mean about Panzerfaust? Panzerfaust is dedicated AT infantry with german RPGs.
In the infantry update thread there was a mention of other infantry, not counting Jaegar.

This post has been edited by Planardweller: 4 Dec 2012, 18:35
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DELETED MEMBER
post 4 Dec 2012, 18:35
Post #102


BANNED
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 728
Joined: 7 June 2009
From: Spain
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (Planardweller @ 4 Dec 2012, 18:30) *
What do you mean about Panzerfaust? Panzerfaust is dedicated AT infantry with german RPGs.


yeah, unguided, bigger ranger and AOE damage, the sheel seems to work a similar way, so another type of infantry with a similar weapon will be rebundant


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spejjarn
post 4 Dec 2012, 19:30
Post #103



Group Icon

Group: Donator
Posts: 227
Joined: 22 August 2012
From: Russian-occupied ECA member-state
Member No.: 9277



QUOTE (MARS @ 4 Dec 2012, 17:54) *
I'll make this a bit more clear:
Claymore = basically a mobile Howitzer = Charles
Pandora = that giant thing you see at the very end = everyone
Mysterious arty-looking vehicle you see around the early middle = Charles, but available in 1.8
Wolfgang & Willem get yet another unique arty that hasn't been seen anywhere yet


Sorry MARS, it doesn't matter how you write stuff here, some people always misunderstand it... like me. Thank you for making the artillery part more understandable blush.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Col._Sandfurz
post 4 Dec 2012, 20:32
Post #104



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 64
Joined: 6 November 2012
Member No.: 9428



I do not think that the shell at 0:36 is a Panzerfaust. We have seen the Panzerfaust being shot out of buildings in some screen shots on FB. There it has kind a grey smoke trail, whereas this one looks like a artilleryshell fired from a firebase or something..
I could be some kind a mortar (like the nukeneer), but the nature of mortars prohibit indoor using (at least if you not want to commit suicide). So maybe it is kind a ATGM like the Milan or Eryx as a soldier able to garison buildings, can not fire a big cannon from the hips^^
Stationary ATGM's are also a defensive weapon IRL => would fit ECA..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr.Kim
post 4 Dec 2012, 20:58
Post #105


Losing Karma to Vault Boy
Group Icon

Group: Tester
Posts: 1302
Joined: 7 June 2009
From: Canada/S.Korea
Member No.: 34
Some future plan mod for AoE3:Asian Dynasty or FO4



At 0:36 was firing rocket with one of gen-power infantry.


--------------------

Let's kick this Russian Tank's ass back to the Bronze Age!

Twitch Chart ID: Mr_kim82

Moddb ID: Mr_Kim
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MARS
post 4 Dec 2012, 20:59
Post #106



Group Icon

Group: Project Leader
Posts: 5870
Joined: 2 June 2009
Member No.: 10



That's right people: ECA Gen Power infantry. Now get that speculation going! laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nemanja
post 4 Dec 2012, 21:18
Post #107



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1863
Joined: 17 April 2012
Member No.: 9081



QUOTE (MARS @ 4 Dec 2012, 17:54) *
I'll make this a bit more clear:
Claymore = basically a mobile Howitzer = Charles
Pandora = that giant thing you see at the very end = everyone
Mysterious arty-looking vehicle you see around the early middle = Charles, but available in 1.8
Wolfgang & Willem get yet another unique arty that hasn't been seen anywhere yet

Will we get some big fat V3/Scud/Tomahawk style rocket launchers by 2.0,on any side ?
I somehow notice that despite these two,ROTR is lacking from them,even Scud launcher is not present in current version.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MARS
post 4 Dec 2012, 21:20
Post #108



Group Icon

Group: Project Leader
Posts: 5870
Joined: 2 June 2009
Member No.: 10



Ibrahiim will eventually get the Scud Launcher - likely overhauled to be more worthy of a gen-exclusive like the Nuke Cannon - and yes, there's gonna be a few more giant ballistic missiles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dangerman
post 4 Dec 2012, 22:24
Post #109


I fits I sits
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 532
Joined: 18 August 2010
From: Wirral, United Kingdom
Member No.: 1107



QUOTE (MARS @ 4 Dec 2012, 21:20) *
Ibrahiim will eventually get the Scud Launcher - likely overhauled to be more worthy of a gen-exclusive like the Nuke Cannon - and yes, there's gonna be a few more giant ballistic missiles.

Will it be likely to have longer range than the Grad, new model/texture and have conventional warheads as an option?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr.Kim
post 4 Dec 2012, 23:30
Post #110


Losing Karma to Vault Boy
Group Icon

Group: Tester
Posts: 1302
Joined: 7 June 2009
From: Canada/S.Korea
Member No.: 34
Some future plan mod for AoE3:Asian Dynasty or FO4



Toplo-M perhaps.


--------------------

Let's kick this Russian Tank's ass back to the Bronze Age!

Twitch Chart ID: Mr_kim82

Moddb ID: Mr_Kim
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shockfan42
post 5 Dec 2012, 0:08
Post #111



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 68
Joined: 21 October 2011
From: Ecuador
Member No.: 8836



Excelent video, ECA look powerful and amazing. But for the number of units show, 1.8 only can be released after of May of 2013? Of curse, I not take in count if new units can play for the actual factions. Thank you, excelent work, great ideas and history, take my vote for the mod of 2012.


--------------------
EMPEROR OF SQUIRRELKIND
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nemanja
post 5 Dec 2012, 0:21
Post #112



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1863
Joined: 17 April 2012
Member No.: 9081



QUOTE (MARS @ 4 Dec 2012, 21:20) *
Ibrahiim will eventually get the Scud Launcher - likely overhauled to be more worthy of a gen-exclusive like the Nuke Cannon - and yes, there's gonna be a few more giant ballistic missiles.

Few more ? serious.gif
With or without Topol ? Reading your Topol description it don't seems to be
a conventional unit as current moving artillery platforms,rather smaller superweapon carried on vehicle.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serialkillerwhal...
post 5 Dec 2012, 1:37
Post #113


Orcinius Genocidalus
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 11 July 2012
From: North Vancouver
Member No.: 9223
No, you move.



Topol-M sounds good. Same fire system as the MSTA but more firepower less fire rate?

Sayyyyy can we has MLRS?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Comr4de
post 5 Dec 2012, 1:54
Post #114


Master of Wreckage
Group Icon

Group: Leader
Posts: 2673
Joined: 31 May 2009
From: Dallas TX, USA
Member No.: 2
Projects: SWR Productions



QUOTE (Serialkillerwhale @ 4 Dec 2012, 18:37) *
Sayyyyy can we has MLRS?



Also the TOPOL M1 is going to be a bit different than you think, you'll see in time. We are planning for the ECA to have a MLRS but will be be designed outside the Generic Shoebox that shoots cigarettes at people.


--------------------

SWR Co-Lead | Texture Artist | Modeler | Level Designer | Fan of all things Awesome
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
__CrUsHeR
post 5 Dec 2012, 2:49
Post #115



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2642
Joined: 18 April 2012
From: Southern Brazil.
Member No.: 9084
"No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise."



QUOTE (Serialkillerwhale @ 4 Dec 2012, 22:37) *
Topol-M sounds good. Same fire system as the MSTA but more firepower less fire rate?


The Topol-M is not based on an artillery with projectiles but in an ICBM, probably caused much damage on enemy units.

According to what was mentioned earlier you must purchase the ICBM separately and each time you launch shall pay to get a new missile.


--------------------

You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nemanja
post 5 Dec 2012, 3:23
Post #116



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1863
Joined: 17 April 2012
Member No.: 9081



QUOTE (Serialkillerwhale @ 5 Dec 2012, 1:37) *
Topol-M sounds good. Same fire system as the MSTA but more firepower less fire rate?

Sayyyyy can we has MLRS?

If you would use forum beside spaming same posts each time and bitching how USA can have this or that or it is under powered,
you would notice one locked topic in "Important Topics" section,it is called "Frequently Asked Questions".
------------
Q08
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serialkillerwhal...
post 5 Dec 2012, 3:34
Post #117


Orcinius Genocidalus
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 11 July 2012
From: North Vancouver
Member No.: 9223
No, you move.



Just noting it would be awesome to have a Rocket launcher that fires cluster rounds.

And yeah, So the Topol is a cheaper one shot superweapon?
QUOTE
Also the TOPOL M1 is going to be a bit different than you think, you'll see in time. We are planning for the ECA to have a MLRS but will be be designed outside the Generic Shoebox that shoots cigarettes at people.


I will never see the MLRS the same way again.

Cigarettes kill

Exploding Rocket Cigarettes kill more

This post has been edited by Serialkillerwhale: 5 Dec 2012, 3:36


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
__CrUsHeR
post 5 Dec 2012, 3:53
Post #118



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2642
Joined: 18 April 2012
From: Southern Brazil.
Member No.: 9084
"No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise."



QUOTE (Serialkillerwhale @ 5 Dec 2012, 0:34) *
And yeah, So the Topol is a cheaper one shot superweapon?


The Topol is fragile and expensive, as I recall each missile should cost about 2000.

It works like a mini-superweapon with a large range however is limited.


--------------------

You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr.Kim
post 5 Dec 2012, 4:38
Post #119


Losing Karma to Vault Boy
Group Icon

Group: Tester
Posts: 1302
Joined: 7 June 2009
From: Canada/S.Korea
Member No.: 34
Some future plan mod for AoE3:Asian Dynasty or FO4



Th cost is $1000 credits per missile and the missile is MIRVs type with Nuclear warhead.



--------------------

Let's kick this Russian Tank's ass back to the Bronze Age!

Twitch Chart ID: Mr_kim82

Moddb ID: Mr_Kim
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serialkillerwhal...
post 5 Dec 2012, 4:39
Post #120


Orcinius Genocidalus
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 11 July 2012
From: North Vancouver
Member No.: 9223
No, you move.



MIRV with nuclear warhead.
So about 5-10 nuke cannon rounds?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5
Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1 June 2024 - 12:46