Rise of the Reds Update: Swamped |
Rise of the Reds Update: Swamped |
4 Dec 2012, 18:30
Post
#101
|
|
Group: Tester Posts: 431 Joined: 5 November 2012 From: Ukraine, Kyiv Member No.: 9425 |
Considering that is not "Venom" From I what heard, Venom is some type of vechile. From "Rise of the Reds Update: Eisenfresser" The part about European R&D compound: The threat of the Russian invasion has forced the ECA to tighten their schedules and send these rare prototypes into combat. Only little is currently known about their exact nature besides sketchy rumours, ranging from a super-heavy 'Manticore' tank over an armoured exo-skeleton dubbed the 'Venom' to what appears to a militarised version of an ESA orbital payload delivery mechanism codenamed 'Pandora'. That the basis for my speculation. What do you mean about Panzerfaust? Panzerfaust is dedicated AT infantry with german RPGs. In the infantry update thread there was a mention of other infantry, not counting Jaegar. This post has been edited by Planardweller: 4 Dec 2012, 18:35 |
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 18:35
Post
#102
|
|
BANNED Group: Members Posts: 728 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: Spain Member No.: 48 |
What do you mean about Panzerfaust? Panzerfaust is dedicated AT infantry with german RPGs. yeah, unguided, bigger ranger and AOE damage, the sheel seems to work a similar way, so another type of infantry with a similar weapon will be rebundant -------------------- |
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 19:30
Post
#103
|
|
Group: Donator Posts: 227 Joined: 22 August 2012 From: Russian-occupied ECA member-state Member No.: 9277 |
I'll make this a bit more clear: Claymore = basically a mobile Howitzer = Charles Pandora = that giant thing you see at the very end = everyone Mysterious arty-looking vehicle you see around the early middle = Charles, but available in 1.8 Wolfgang & Willem get yet another unique arty that hasn't been seen anywhere yet Sorry MARS, it doesn't matter how you write stuff here, some people always misunderstand it... like me. Thank you for making the artillery part more understandable -------------------- |
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 20:32
Post
#104
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 64 Joined: 6 November 2012 Member No.: 9428 |
I do not think that the shell at 0:36 is a Panzerfaust. We have seen the Panzerfaust being shot out of buildings in some screen shots on FB. There it has kind a grey smoke trail, whereas this one looks like a artilleryshell fired from a firebase or something..
I could be some kind a mortar (like the nukeneer), but the nature of mortars prohibit indoor using (at least if you not want to commit suicide). So maybe it is kind a ATGM like the Milan or Eryx as a soldier able to garison buildings, can not fire a big cannon from the hips^^ Stationary ATGM's are also a defensive weapon IRL => would fit ECA.. |
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 20:58
Post
#105
|
|
Losing Karma to Vault Boy Group: Tester Posts: 1302 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: Canada/S.Korea Member No.: 34 Some future plan mod for AoE3:Asian Dynasty or FO4 |
At 0:36 was firing rocket with one of gen-power infantry.
-------------------- Let's kick this Russian Tank's ass back to the Bronze Age! Twitch Chart ID: Mr_kim82 Moddb ID: Mr_Kim |
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 20:59
Post
#106
|
|
Group: Project Leader Posts: 5870 Joined: 2 June 2009 Member No.: 10 |
That's right people: ECA Gen Power infantry. Now get that speculation going!
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 21:18
Post
#107
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1863 Joined: 17 April 2012 Member No.: 9081 |
I'll make this a bit more clear: Claymore = basically a mobile Howitzer = Charles Pandora = that giant thing you see at the very end = everyone Mysterious arty-looking vehicle you see around the early middle = Charles, but available in 1.8 Wolfgang & Willem get yet another unique arty that hasn't been seen anywhere yet Will we get some big fat V3/Scud/Tomahawk style rocket launchers by 2.0,on any side ? I somehow notice that despite these two,ROTR is lacking from them,even Scud launcher is not present in current version. |
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 21:20
Post
#108
|
|
Group: Project Leader Posts: 5870 Joined: 2 June 2009 Member No.: 10 |
Ibrahiim will eventually get the Scud Launcher - likely overhauled to be more worthy of a gen-exclusive like the Nuke Cannon - and yes, there's gonna be a few more giant ballistic missiles.
|
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 22:24
Post
#109
|
|
I fits I sits Group: Members Posts: 532 Joined: 18 August 2010 From: Wirral, United Kingdom Member No.: 1107 |
Ibrahiim will eventually get the Scud Launcher - likely overhauled to be more worthy of a gen-exclusive like the Nuke Cannon - and yes, there's gonna be a few more giant ballistic missiles. Will it be likely to have longer range than the Grad, new model/texture and have conventional warheads as an option? |
|
|
4 Dec 2012, 23:30
Post
#110
|
|
Losing Karma to Vault Boy Group: Tester Posts: 1302 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: Canada/S.Korea Member No.: 34 Some future plan mod for AoE3:Asian Dynasty or FO4 |
Toplo-M perhaps.
-------------------- Let's kick this Russian Tank's ass back to the Bronze Age! Twitch Chart ID: Mr_kim82 Moddb ID: Mr_Kim |
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 0:08
Post
#111
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 68 Joined: 21 October 2011 From: Ecuador Member No.: 8836 |
Excelent video, ECA look powerful and amazing. But for the number of units show, 1.8 only can be released after of May of 2013? Of curse, I not take in count if new units can play for the actual factions. Thank you, excelent work, great ideas and history, take my vote for the mod of 2012.
-------------------- EMPEROR OF SQUIRRELKIND
|
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 0:21
Post
#112
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1863 Joined: 17 April 2012 Member No.: 9081 |
Ibrahiim will eventually get the Scud Launcher - likely overhauled to be more worthy of a gen-exclusive like the Nuke Cannon - and yes, there's gonna be a few more giant ballistic missiles. Few more ? With or without Topol ? Reading your Topol description it don't seems to be a conventional unit as current moving artillery platforms,rather smaller superweapon carried on vehicle. |
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 1:37
Post
#113
|
|
Orcinius Genocidalus Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 11 July 2012 From: North Vancouver Member No.: 9223 No, you move. |
Topol-M sounds good. Same fire system as the MSTA but more firepower less fire rate?
Sayyyyy can we has MLRS? -------------------- |
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 1:54
Post
#114
|
|
Master of Wreckage Group: Leader Posts: 2673 Joined: 31 May 2009 From: Dallas TX, USA Member No.: 2 Projects: SWR Productions |
Sayyyyy can we has MLRS? Also the TOPOL M1 is going to be a bit different than you think, you'll see in time. We are planning for the ECA to have a MLRS but will be be designed outside the Generic Shoebox that shoots cigarettes at people. -------------------- SWR Co-Lead | Texture Artist | Modeler | Level Designer | Fan of all things Awesome |
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 2:49
Post
#115
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2642 Joined: 18 April 2012 From: Southern Brazil. Member No.: 9084 "No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise." |
Topol-M sounds good. Same fire system as the MSTA but more firepower less fire rate? The Topol-M is not based on an artillery with projectiles but in an ICBM, probably caused much damage on enemy units. According to what was mentioned earlier you must purchase the ICBM separately and each time you launch shall pay to get a new missile. -------------------- You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction |
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 3:23
Post
#116
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1863 Joined: 17 April 2012 Member No.: 9081 |
Topol-M sounds good. Same fire system as the MSTA but more firepower less fire rate? Sayyyyy can we has MLRS? If you would use forum beside spaming same posts each time and bitching how USA can have this or that or it is under powered, you would notice one locked topic in "Important Topics" section,it is called "Frequently Asked Questions". ------------ Q08 |
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 3:34
Post
#117
|
|
Orcinius Genocidalus Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 11 July 2012 From: North Vancouver Member No.: 9223 No, you move. |
Just noting it would be awesome to have a Rocket launcher that fires cluster rounds.
And yeah, So the Topol is a cheaper one shot superweapon? QUOTE Also the TOPOL M1 is going to be a bit different than you think, you'll see in time. We are planning for the ECA to have a MLRS but will be be designed outside the Generic Shoebox that shoots cigarettes at people. I will never see the MLRS the same way again. Cigarettes kill Exploding Rocket Cigarettes kill more This post has been edited by Serialkillerwhale: 5 Dec 2012, 3:36 -------------------- |
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 3:53
Post
#118
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2642 Joined: 18 April 2012 From: Southern Brazil. Member No.: 9084 "No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise." |
And yeah, So the Topol is a cheaper one shot superweapon? The Topol is fragile and expensive, as I recall each missile should cost about 2000. It works like a mini-superweapon with a large range however is limited. -------------------- You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction |
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 4:38
Post
#119
|
|
Losing Karma to Vault Boy Group: Tester Posts: 1302 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: Canada/S.Korea Member No.: 34 Some future plan mod for AoE3:Asian Dynasty or FO4 |
Th cost is $1000 credits per missile and the missile is MIRVs type with Nuclear warhead.
-------------------- Let's kick this Russian Tank's ass back to the Bronze Age! Twitch Chart ID: Mr_kim82 Moddb ID: Mr_Kim |
|
|
5 Dec 2012, 4:39
Post
#120
|
|
Orcinius Genocidalus Group: Members Posts: 2428 Joined: 11 July 2012 From: North Vancouver Member No.: 9223 No, you move. |
MIRV with nuclear warhead.
So about 5-10 nuke cannon rounds? -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1 June 2024 - 12:22 |