IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
NK Missiles
Maxner12
post 9 Apr 2013, 15:08
Post #126



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 193
Joined: 25 December 2012
Member No.: 9552



Latest bs update: http://www.euronews.com/2013/04/09/north-k...uate-the-south/
The priorities of the regime (even in terms of propaganda) are nice anyways. If it came to a war, foreigners would be their last thing to mind.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pepo
post 9 Apr 2013, 18:25
Post #127



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 517
Joined: 18 March 2013
From: Spain
Member No.: 9862



QUOTE (Maxner12 @ 9 Apr 2013, 16:08) *
Latest bs update: http://www.euronews.com/2013/04/09/north-k...uate-the-south/
The priorities of the regime (even in terms of propaganda) are nice anyways. If it came to a war, foreigners would be their last thing to mind.

They only have done this to try that other countries doesn't attack then when they star the war against sk
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Warpath
post 9 Apr 2013, 23:31
Post #128


Mad General... MUAHAHAHAHA!!!
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 309
Joined: 22 February 2012
From: Philippines
Member No.: 9008
Follower of the Grimdark.



dry.gif Uh huh, their not even going to war, aside from the missile deployment and Kaesong's closing to the south most of 'em threats are just bullshit.


--------------------
QUOTE
"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."
- George S. Patton

QUOTE
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.

- The Neconomicon

QUOTE
Two things are infinite: the universe and the human stupidity.
- Albert Einstein (attributed)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serialkillerwhal...
post 11 Apr 2013, 15:36
Post #129


Orcinius Genocidalus
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 11 July 2012
From: North Vancouver
Member No.: 9223
No, you move.



If they're planning to invade they wouldn't ring so many bells
they'd just zerg rush SK.
Bah this is just kim jon whateveritisthistime's coming of age ceremony, pissing off the global community


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
__CrUsHeR
post 12 Apr 2013, 13:43
Post #130



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2642
Joined: 18 April 2012
From: Southern Brazil.
Member No.: 9084
"No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise."



Today the North American secretary of state John Kerry said that NK will not be accepted as a nuclear power and this is exactly the content of the article I read recently.

The article:

NUCLEAR - Reject the plow wielding the sword

Leonam dos Santos Guimarães
PhD in engineering and member
Standing Advisory Group on Nuclear Energy in
Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)


Five countries are internationally recognized as "states with nuclear weapons". They have these weapons right granted by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT): the U.S., UK, France, China and Russia. Meanwhile, other countries have these weapons "in fact" and not "of right."

Three of them, are not signatories to the NPT, formally declared and demonstrated in practice by testing nuclear possess them: India, Pakistan and North Korea. Although he never directly stated or shown, there seems no doubt that Israel, which is not a signatory of the NPT, has also. South Africa, when he had not joined the NPT, had also, but decided to disassemble them voluntarily. Ukraine also stored nuclear weapons on its territory, but they were fully repatriated to Russia by agreement after the demise of the USSR. Today, Iran is accused by the international community to be seeking to obtain them, which is being treated as a major threat to world peace.

But what said about the five European countries that have nuclear weapons on their territory of American origin "undeclared", including Belgium, Germany, Turkey, Holland and Italy? Do they not also constitute a threat? The existence of nuclear weapons in these five countries, including operating procedures and means for their jobs, is formally recognized by NATO.

The U.S. has some 480 B61 thermonuclear weapons in these five "non-state nuclear weapon" by the NPT and develop a program of modernization of these weapons. Its existence is ignored by the IAEA, which is the technical organism that have international UN delegation to monitor compliance with the commitments made by countries acceding to the NPT. Among these five "undeclared nuclear states", Germany is the most armed, The German Air Force has three bases that can store up to 150 weapons and operate German aircraft "Tornado", capable of launching nuclear warheads.

The intended installation and accumulation of tactical weapons B61 in these five "non-state nuclear weapon"? What are the potential targets of these weapons? Given its technical operating, they could only be used against targets in Russia and Eastern Europe or the Middle East and North Africa.

This reality implies many contradictions, typical cases of "two weights, two measures". The first is that while some of these same European countries nuclear weapon "actually" accuse Iran of seeking them, they themselves are able to attack him with those same weapons. The second is that three of these five countries, Germany, Italy and Belgium, decided to abandon the peaceful use of nuclear energy is that electricity generation under the justification of "high risk", but none decided to return the weapons to the U.S., as did the Ukraine to Russia. Does nuclear plants are at greater risk than the "atomic bombs"? The political class and society in these countries seem to think so.

Germany is the most emblematic case of this contradiction: is not a nuclear power "in right" in the NPT, but stocks nuclear weapons manufactured in the U.S. and its own air force is capable of delivering them. The company EADS, controlled by the powerful Daimler Group is the supplier for France's M51 ballistic missile, capable of launching nuclear warheads from submarines and even the German shipyard HDW is the supplier for Israel submarines capable of launching missiles with nuclear weapons.

At the same time, Germany has decided to decommission all its nuclear power generation park in the wake of the Fukushima accident. This has meant an increase in the generation of greenhouse gases, affecting the entire world, and a high cost to the country, to be borne by the German society. Reject the plowand embrace the sword.


NOTE: Text translated from Portuguese into English by me with the help of Google, sure there are some errors in translation, however must be understandable.
------------------------

Really are "two weights and two measures," such as requiring that the NK has no nuclear weapons if the USA has them at odds with the NPT? It really is something to think about...


--------------------

You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pepo
post 12 Apr 2013, 17:20
Post #131



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 517
Joined: 18 March 2013
From: Spain
Member No.: 9862



Crusher:i like that the last paragraph of the article.nuclear energy is normally see has far worst than thermal energy,but it isn't.
Anyway i doubt that these articles take into account that the leader from germany is not crazy has the one in nk.also these weapons are lf the nato,so i suppose they will need a permision to launch then
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MARS
post 12 Apr 2013, 20:00
Post #132



Group Icon

Group: Project Leader
Posts: 5870
Joined: 2 June 2009
Member No.: 10



This is all part of a NATO policy called 'nuclear sharing'. Back during the Cold War, the US gave Germany, Italy, Turkey, Belgium and the Netherlands the permission to use a number of US-made nukes in the event of a war in order to include allies with no nuclear programme of their own in the NATO framework of deterrence. German nuclear policies are odd to say the least. We've always had a rather rampant anti-nuclear lobby and an ongoing debate over the permanent storage of nuclear waste. Several years ago, our government decided to shut down all nuclear plants over the following years until our current government pulled a complete U-turn on the issue, only to do another U-turn after the events of Fukushima. Can't say I agree with this whole line of reasoning, but that's a debate for another day.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tgn89
post 16 Apr 2013, 20:26
Post #133



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 285
Joined: 9 May 2012
Member No.: 9109



Theres another thing when the US goes to war with em norks WE will also have to thats what ya get when you have the most "powerfull" country at your side on this fuckin planet on the other hand though i wouldnt mind (if it happens of course) to go kick kim jong buums ass what a fuck he is .
Funny thing is after the 1.korean war turks and south koreans are considered brothers well cant say thats wrong considering that i see a lot of koreans even a restaurant and i got plenty friends with them sorry if i went of topic here

On topic: NK is really playing ball here not only are they treathning İts neighbour with nukes plus also threatining İts own people i dont get it whats with this bullshit so what they prefer democrasy over commies.huh the yankees are the enemy of the koreans bullshit i tell you .and whats gotten kim jong un so much does he think he is the keeper of the koreans and did he even have his own nation to be the "true" koreans son of a bitch

This post has been edited by tgn89: 16 Apr 2013, 20:27


--------------------
DOZER move aside !
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V  « < 4 5 6
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28 March 2024 - 13:38