GLA buildings, garrisonable by infantry? |
GLA buildings, garrisonable by infantry? |
18 Jun 2009, 20:04
Post
#1
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 18 June 2009 From: Leeuwarden, Holland Member No.: 180 |
I thought I had read that article once on Fallout about doing that
is this still planned or not? -------------------- QUOTE Who needs rockets, when we have Lasers? |
|
|
18 Jun 2009, 20:14
Post
#2
|
|
Group: Dev. Team Posts: 1220 Joined: 8 June 2009 From: East Coast of either China or the US Member No.: 96 Projects: SWR Productions |
You must've been reading the suggestion forums because I don't remember any plans like this.
-------------------- |
|
|
18 Jun 2009, 20:19
Post
#3
|
|
Officer of the European Continental Army Group: Members Posts: 2351 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: England, Great Britain Member No.: 71 Community Manager at Nexus Mods |
The Palace is garrisonable and that's annoying enough T.T
-------------------- |
|
|
18 Jun 2009, 20:31
Post
#4
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 18 June 2009 From: Leeuwarden, Holland Member No.: 180 |
You must've been reading the suggestion forums because I don't remember any plans like this. aah okay, it would have been fun though xD -------------------- QUOTE Who needs rockets, when we have Lasers? |
|
|
18 Jun 2009, 21:22
Post
#5
|
|
Kitteh Group: Legend Posts: 590 Joined: 31 May 2009 From: Northern Ireland Member No.: 6 Projects: SWR Productions |
is this still planned or not? It was never planned and it isn't something we are going to be doing, either. -------------------- |
|
|
18 Jun 2009, 21:50
Post
#6
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 74 Joined: 15 June 2009 Member No.: 166 |
Palace and vGLA ghetto houses, that's it. Though latter one is as protective as stinger sites are for the stinger troopers
This post has been edited by accomplice: 18 Jun 2009, 22:01 |
|
|
18 Jun 2009, 21:56
Post
#7
|
|
Forum Chemist Group: Members Posts: 687 Joined: 5 June 2009 From: Zeist, the Netherlands Member No.: 19 Projects: ShockWave Tester In birro veritas. |
It probably has something to do with the alpha version of ZH, in which this was planned. IIRC it has never been on the shw to-do list, though.
-------------------- TN
"The courageous enter dark caves alone. The clever send in the courageous first. The cleverest wait behind the clever." --The Book of Cataclysm |
|
|
18 Jun 2009, 23:25
Post
#8
|
|
Not more Demotraps! Group: Members Posts: 122 Joined: 31 May 2009 From: Netherlands Member No.: 7 Projects: SWR Productions Demotrap Layer |
Although the concept itself is interesting, a Palace is already a major obstacle for any opponent.
Now imagine a turtling GLA player having his Command Center, Arms Dealer and Palace all garrisoned and Fortified, reinforced by Stingers and Tunnels.\ On top of that, Fortified Buildings are very tough to kill, and they leave a GLA hole to boot. It would be overpowering a faction that already has the best base building and rebuilding capability even more. As said, an interesting concept, but extremely unbalanced. -------------------- Proud producer of the forum family |
|
|
18 Jun 2009, 23:27
Post
#9
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 363 Joined: 16 June 2009 From: Irving, TX Member No.: 167 |
I nvr use the palace garrison as it is i dont see the point in any others having it
|
|
|
18 Jun 2009, 23:42
Post
#10
|
|
Captain of the U.S.S. Kelvin Group: Members Posts: 84 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: WA, USA Member No.: 32 Exploring new worlds... |
I nvr use the palace garrison as it is i dont see the point in any others having it Then you are really missing out on one of the best defensive buildings for the GLA matey. Try it out sometime. Its better than any bunker that China can build (except for the fortified bunker, that thing can really be only taken down by superweapon strikes.) -------------------- |
|
|
19 Jun 2009, 0:17
Post
#11
|
|
Forum Green Group: Legend Posts: 1350 Joined: 4 June 2009 From: Netherlands Member No.: 17 Projects: SWR Productions |
Using the palace as a defensive building in a compact GLA base is the best thing you can have for GLA when defending. GLA does not have able stationary defenses so if you want to protect your base, the Palace is really a must.
-------------------- |
|
|
19 Jun 2009, 0:28
Post
#12
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 18 June 2009 From: Leeuwarden, Holland Member No.: 180 |
okay, my fault
thx guys for answering so quickly but you must’nt build you palace at your defences, right? . so whats the point than? or am i wrong -------------------- QUOTE Who needs rockets, when we have Lasers? |
|
|
19 Jun 2009, 0:46
Post
#13
|
|
Kitteh Group: Legend Posts: 590 Joined: 31 May 2009 From: Northern Ireland Member No.: 6 Projects: SWR Productions |
The best defense is a good offense, but a well placed Palace can also serve to augment a GLA starting position (which is usually always located at the first Supply Dock).
-------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27 April 2024 - 1:51 |