PM Spam Bot, GooDFriend |
![]() ![]() |
PM Spam Bot, GooDFriend |
26 Jan 2010, 13:08
Post
#51
|
|
![]() Sergeant Mike Watling ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1553 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: England, Great Britain Member No.: 71 The Spectre of death does not daunt me, for I am already dead. |
I found this CODE .nosee { display:none; } <p class="nosee"> <label for="email">Ihre eMail wird nicht abgefragt, tragen Sie auch hier bitte NICHTS ein:</label> <input id="email" name="email" size="60" value="" /> </p> <?php if(isset($_POST['email']) && $_POST['email']) { # nicht eintragen, sondern Mitteilung über Spamverdacht } ?> this only works if hide in css source (German) What does the code do? (I don't speak german) -------------------- ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
26 Jan 2010, 13:19
Post
#52
|
|
![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 641 Joined: 31 May 2009 From: EU Member No.: 8 Projects: SWR Tester Old sneaky german |
You have a hidden form that ask for mail address.
The normal user will not see this but the bot will fill in (as far as i did understood). -------------------- |
|
|
|
26 Jan 2010, 19:40
Post
#53
|
|
![]() Saint ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1219 Joined: 19 June 2009 From: Makai Member No.: 182 Peace for all~ |
That would be handy, maybe, but what if the bot can decode/read it?
-------------------- |
|
|
|
26 Jan 2010, 20:35
Post
#54
|
|
![]() AKA Scope/Viseur ![]() Group: Members Posts: 366 Joined: 6 June 2009 From: Paradise Lost Member No.: 38 Proud Lebanese |
How much security do you want? I think image-based CAPTCHA will thwart most of the bots. Those that DO get through can be disposed of easily anyway.
-------------------- Avvie and Sig by TheDr
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
27 Jan 2010, 1:05
Post
#55
|
|
|
Товариш ![]() Group: Members Posts: 445 Joined: 17 June 2009 From: Bay, Laguna, Philippines Member No.: 175 Cool story, bro! |
Sounds good, but like a text captcha, it can be decoded by bots by recognition, although it may be hard for them. Through the use of audio support to help the user read the words in the captcha (e.g. uppercase: A; lowercase d; space; uppercase F...), could it be used by bots to exploit it and use it to their advantage?
-------------------- ![]() QUOTE (Winston Churchill) Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result. |
|
|
|
27 Jan 2010, 1:39
Post
#56
|
|
![]() Daburu ![]() Group: Members Posts: 653 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: Sydney Member No.: 46 Sloth of a man leaning on a trunk in front of a rainbow |
I think Wi-ta's form is the best thus far, as it completely discriminates between a bot and the user so there is practically no chance for an authentic user to be denied, even though some bots may still come through.
This post has been edited by Alias: 27 Jan 2010, 1:39 -------------------- |
|
|
|
27 Jan 2010, 15:23
Post
#57
|
|
![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 489 Joined: 14 June 2009 From: Sri Lanka Member No.: 155 |
My question is do these bots target the SWR site deliberately or is it just a small part of a larger attack against forums using the specific forum software? If it is specific case questionnaire is not a good solution....but if it is not, then the questionnaire might be a good idea. Wi-Ta's suggestion is also good IMO.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
27 Jan 2010, 15:49
Post
#58
|
|
![]() Sergeant Mike Watling ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1553 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: England, Great Britain Member No.: 71 The Spectre of death does not daunt me, for I am already dead. |
I don't think there's anything personal against SWR - just some bastards that think they gain something by filling the internet forums with spam
-------------------- ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
29 Jan 2010, 0:45
Post
#59
|
|
|
Товариш ![]() Group: Members Posts: 445 Joined: 17 June 2009 From: Bay, Laguna, Philippines Member No.: 175 Cool story, bro! |
Or they feel good and find it fun, like "Boom! Hahaha, you've been rickrolled, sucka'!" when they're wreaking havoc.
If possible and practical, why not use both security features? -------------------- ![]() QUOTE (Winston Churchill) Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10 September 2010 - 17:42 |