IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
GLA buildings, garrisonable by infantry?
wew1994
post 18 Jun 2009, 20:04
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 18 June 2009
From: Leeuwarden, Holland
Member No.: 180



I thought I had read that article once on Fallout about doing that

is this still planned or not?


--------------------

QUOTE
Who needs rockets, when we have Lasers?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NergiZed
post 18 Jun 2009, 20:14
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Dev. Team
Posts: 1220
Joined: 8 June 2009
From: East Coast of either China or the US
Member No.: 96
Projects: SWR Productions



You must've been reading the suggestion forums because I don't remember any plans like this.


--------------------

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pickysaurus
post 18 Jun 2009, 20:19
Post #3


Officer of the European Continental Army
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2351
Joined: 7 June 2009
From: England, Great Britain
Member No.: 71
Community Manager at Nexus Mods



The Palace is garrisonable and that's annoying enough T.T


--------------------


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wew1994
post 18 Jun 2009, 20:31
Post #4



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 18 June 2009
From: Leeuwarden, Holland
Member No.: 180



QUOTE (NergiZed @ 18 Jun 2009, 18:14) *
You must've been reading the suggestion forums because I don't remember any plans like this.


aah okay, it would have been fun though xD


--------------------

QUOTE
Who needs rockets, when we have Lasers?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stinger
post 18 Jun 2009, 21:22
Post #5


Kitteh
Group Icon

Group: Legend
Posts: 590
Joined: 31 May 2009
From: Northern Ireland
Member No.: 6
Projects: SWR Productions



QUOTE (wew1994 @ 18 Jun 2009, 17:04) *
is this still planned or not?


It was never planned and it isn't something we are going to be doing, either. smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
accomplice
post 18 Jun 2009, 21:50
Post #6



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 15 June 2009
Member No.: 166



Palace and vGLA ghetto houses, that's it. Though latter one is as protective as stinger sites are for the stinger troopers smile.gif

This post has been edited by accomplice: 18 Jun 2009, 22:01
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Chyros
post 18 Jun 2009, 21:56
Post #7


Forum Chemist
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 687
Joined: 5 June 2009
From: Zeist, the Netherlands
Member No.: 19
Projects: ShockWave Tester
In birro veritas.



It probably has something to do with the alpha version of ZH, in which this was planned. IIRC it has never been on the shw to-do list, though.


--------------------
TN

"The courageous enter dark caves alone. The clever send in the courageous first. The cleverest wait behind the clever."
--The Book of Cataclysm

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thez
post 18 Jun 2009, 23:25
Post #8


Not more Demotraps!
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 122
Joined: 31 May 2009
From: Netherlands
Member No.: 7
Projects: SWR Productions
Demotrap Layer



Although the concept itself is interesting, a Palace is already a major obstacle for any opponent.
Now imagine a turtling GLA player having his Command Center, Arms Dealer and Palace all garrisoned and Fortified, reinforced by Stingers and Tunnels.\
On top of that, Fortified Buildings are very tough to kill, and they leave a GLA hole to boot.
It would be overpowering a faction that already has the best base building and rebuilding capability even more.
As said, an interesting concept, but extremely unbalanced.


--------------------

Proud producer of the forum family
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
C.o.m.m.a.n.d.e....
post 18 Jun 2009, 23:27
Post #9



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 363
Joined: 16 June 2009
From: Irving, TX
Member No.: 167



I nvr use the palace garrison as it is i dont see the point in any others having it
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lord Atlantis
post 18 Jun 2009, 23:42
Post #10


Captain of the U.S.S. Kelvin
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 84
Joined: 7 June 2009
From: WA, USA
Member No.: 32
Exploring new worlds...



QUOTE (C.o.m.m.a.n.d.e.r @ 18 Jun 2009, 12:27) *
I nvr use the palace garrison as it is i dont see the point in any others having it

Then you are really missing out on one of the best defensive buildings for the GLA matey. Try it out sometime. Its better than any bunker that China can build smile.gif (except for the fortified bunker, that thing can really be only taken down by superweapon strikes.)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shock
post 19 Jun 2009, 0:17
Post #11


Forum Green
Group Icon

Group: Legend
Posts: 1350
Joined: 4 June 2009
From: Netherlands
Member No.: 17
Projects: SWR Productions



Using the palace as a defensive building in a compact GLA base is the best thing you can have for GLA when defending. GLA does not have able stationary defenses so if you want to protect your base, the Palace is really a must.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wew1994
post 19 Jun 2009, 0:28
Post #12



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 18 June 2009
From: Leeuwarden, Holland
Member No.: 180



okay, my fault smile.gif

thx guys for answering so quickly

but you must’nt build you palace at your defences, right? . so whats the point than?
or am i wrong I8.gif


--------------------

QUOTE
Who needs rockets, when we have Lasers?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stinger
post 19 Jun 2009, 0:46
Post #13


Kitteh
Group Icon

Group: Legend
Posts: 590
Joined: 31 May 2009
From: Northern Ireland
Member No.: 6
Projects: SWR Productions



The best defense is a good offense, but a well placed Palace can also serve to augment a GLA starting position (which is usually always located at the first Supply Dock).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19 October 2018 - 2:18