IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1.82, what do you want to see?
z741
post 29 Dec 2012, 6:37
Post #1


Stealth Master
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 298
Joined: 10 February 2012
From: USA
Member No.: 8990



i was curious as to what everybody wants to see, aside from what the devs have told us.

personally i would like to see the GLA having a dirty nuke mindfuck.gif

ECA howitzers to show the dead zone (for all those not military literate it means minimum range) as well as being able to select multiples

USA possibly more chopper options

China, why not add a flame tower? i can see the pyro in a bunker with 4 tank hunters but say there's not a barracks by an outpost you have built.

Russia thus far is pretty good, i would like to try aerial assaults, say take a chopper and strip it of all weapons for greater transporting capacity? the ruskies have a knack for thinking of everything

This post has been edited by z741: 29 Dec 2012, 6:47


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
(USA)Bruce
post 29 Dec 2012, 10:22
Post #2


The Forums American Hotshot Flyboy
Group Icon

Group: Tester
Posts: 2859
Joined: 22 November 2012
From: The foundation of modern freedom and Liberty;United States of America.
Member No.: 9500



CODE
1. Do not create a suggestion thread in our General Forum. No suggestions are to be made at this time. We have plenty planned. A suggestion forum will be created once we decide it to be so.
10. It is a game, dont start rambling about something not being realistic or inaccurate and most of all, do not start rambling about Tesla weapons for this Russia.


QUOTE


Nuff said


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
J Y fortress
post 29 Dec 2012, 10:26
Post #3



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 74
Joined: 23 July 2012
From: China
Member No.: 9241



China‘s Helix

This post has been edited by J Y fortress: 29 Dec 2012, 10:26
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Knjaz.
post 29 Dec 2012, 10:38
Post #4



Group Icon

Group: Tester
Posts: 1833
Joined: 29 May 2012
Member No.: 9155



Afaik, DevTeam already planned out on what will go into 1.8.2. So yeah...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The_Hunter
post 29 Dec 2012, 10:41
Post #5



Group Icon

Group: Administrator
Posts: 5732
Joined: 31 May 2009
From: The Netherlands
Member No.: 1
Projects: SWR Productions
Bitch slapping SAGE since 2003



QUOTE ((USA)Bruce @ 29 Dec 2012, 11:22) *
Nuff said


He's just guessing what units might be added not suggesting new ones.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Claine
post 29 Dec 2012, 11:03
Post #6



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 408
Joined: 22 December 2011
From: Philippines
Member No.: 8902



i want to see polished control bar rolleyes.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dangerman
post 29 Dec 2012, 11:48
Post #7


I fits I sits
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 532
Joined: 18 August 2010
From: Wirral, United Kingdom
Member No.: 1107



I'd like to see a Zhukov unit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DELETED MEMBER
post 29 Dec 2012, 12:50
Post #8


BANNED
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 728
Joined: 7 June 2009
From: Spain
Member No.: 48



Venom and all it comes with her I8.gif

This post has been edited by Kirasama: 29 Dec 2012, 12:51


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shredder
post 29 Dec 2012, 13:10
Post #9



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 19 November 2012
From: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Member No.: 9497



QUOTE (Kirasama @ 29 Dec 2012, 13:50) *
Venom and all it comes with her I8.gif

This. awbot.gif

and a darker ECA Control Bar. Imo, the current one is too bright and I often find myself not knowing that I have a Point to use in my General Powers. sleep.gif Probably something similar in brightness to the normal USA one.

This post has been edited by Shredder: 29 Dec 2012, 13:27
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
__CrUsHeR
post 29 Dec 2012, 13:17
Post #10



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2642
Joined: 18 April 2012
From: Southern Brazil.
Member No.: 9084
"No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise."



It would be nice to see a bit of original content of the VZH (Helix, Aurora, Scud...), I still miss it.


--------------------

You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Knjaz.
post 29 Dec 2012, 13:24
Post #11



Group Icon

Group: Tester
Posts: 1833
Joined: 29 May 2012
Member No.: 9155



QUOTE (__CrUsHeR @ 29 Dec 2012, 14:17) *
It would be nice to see a bit of original content of the VZH (Helix, Aurora, Scud...), I still miss it.


As it was mentioned many times, you will see some of it - but in 2.0, where those units will be general-specific.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
__CrUsHeR
post 29 Dec 2012, 13:32
Post #12



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2642
Joined: 18 April 2012
From: Southern Brazil.
Member No.: 9084
"No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise."



QUOTE (Knjaz. @ 29 Dec 2012, 10:24) *
As it was mentioned many times, you will see some of it - but in 2.0, where those units will be general-specific.


I know that, however I would like to see these units before the version 2.0, the Helix and the Aurora mainly are important units for strategies of attack and defense of their respective factions.

Logically need to be balanced to suit the new content.


--------------------

You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SpiralSpectre
post 29 Dec 2012, 15:18
Post #13



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1080
Joined: 24 December 2011
Member No.: 8905
Loves guessing games



QUOTE (Kirasama @ 29 Dec 2012, 17:50) *
Venom and all it comes with her I8.gif

Hey wait Venom is a she? Man I missed a lot.

On topic... a second Microwave based unit for US, a medium/heavy (not super heavy) tank for China, a splashy artillery for Russia, a tier one indirect fire artillery for ECA, more salvage usage for GLA.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
IPS
post 29 Dec 2012, 15:30
Post #14


How come nobody says wizard anymore
Group Icon

Group: Moderator
Posts: 976
Joined: 7 June 2009
Member No.: 36
Projects: SWR Productions



I would like to see a remake for the.. oh wait that's up to me, damnit. ><
and also,.. ah nevermind ^^

This post has been edited by IPS: 29 Dec 2012, 15:31


--------------------
DeviantArt Portfolio

CGSociety Portfolio

"a dollar symbol is not an eagle"
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serialkillerwhal...
post 29 Dec 2012, 16:16
Post #15


Orcinius Genocidalus
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 11 July 2012
From: North Vancouver
Member No.: 9223
No, you move.



I'd like to see more explosions.


Also, more seriously, an explanation for why the F-22 (Which uses AIM-120 AMRAAM Missiles) Does less damage to air targest than the chaparal (Which uses AIM-120 AMRAAM Missiles).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GeneralCamo
post 29 Dec 2012, 16:19
Post #16


That person
Group Icon

Group: Project Leader
Posts: 1425
Joined: 20 September 2009
From: Cyberspace
Member No.: 417
C&C ShockWave Co-Leader



Here is my list:
Venom
Solar Blast options
A heavy lift transport for USA
Remodeled Cobra
Some more leaked INI files (he he he)
A tank destroyer for GLA (Think chameleon from SHW, but not really)

The only thing on this list that has been confirmed for 1.82 is Venom, but the Solar Blast options, Heavy Lift Transport, and Remodeled Cobra are also confirmed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SpiralSpectre
post 29 Dec 2012, 16:20
Post #17



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1080
Joined: 24 December 2011
Member No.: 8905
Loves guessing games



QUOTE (Serialkillerwhale @ 29 Dec 2012, 21:16) *
Also, more seriously, an explanation for why the F-22 (Which uses AIM-120 AMRAAM Missiles) Does less damage to air targest than the chaparal (Which uses AIM-120 AMRAAM Missiles).

What makes you so sure the ROTR F-22 or Chappie use exactly that particular type of missile?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serialkillerwhal...
post 29 Dec 2012, 16:21
Post #18


Orcinius Genocidalus
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 11 July 2012
From: North Vancouver
Member No.: 9223
No, you move.



QUOTE
A tank destroyer for GLA (Think chameleon from SHW, but not really)


Ahem, The marauder tank is technically a Tank Destroyer.
QUOTE
What makes you so sure the ROTR F-22 or Chappie use exactly that particular type of missile?


Well,
QUOTE
The Chaparral is back from its retirement in the 90’s and even though the frame is mostly unchanged it’s now packing AIM-120 AMRAAM missiles. Not only the new missiles boost performance over the old Sidewinders but make the Chaparral an anti-air platform that can be easily manufactured and is reliable.
The Chaparral is known for three things: precision, firepower and long range. Once a target is locked on and the missile is fired there is no escape for its prey. If your Raptors aren’t enough then what you need is a Chaparral. It will keep your skies safe and will seriously discourage future air incursions from your enemy.


F-22s use it cuz it's the RL version's choice (And because of lack of fluff stating otherwise really XP)

EDIT: What? I like fluff.

This post has been edited by Serialkillerwhale: 29 Dec 2012, 16:25


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GeneralCamo
post 29 Dec 2012, 16:21
Post #19


That person
Group Icon

Group: Project Leader
Posts: 1425
Joined: 20 September 2009
From: Cyberspace
Member No.: 417
C&C ShockWave Co-Leader



QUOTE (Serialkillerwhale @ 29 Dec 2012, 11:16) *
Also, more seriously, an explanation for why the F-22 (Which uses AIM-120 AMRAAM Missiles) Does less damage to air targest than the chaparal (Which uses AIM-120 AMRAAM Missiles).

Well, in-lore, the F-22 lost most of its air superiority in favour of multi-purposeness and ability to mass produce.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Serialkillerwhal...
post 29 Dec 2012, 16:26
Post #20


Orcinius Genocidalus
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2428
Joined: 11 July 2012
From: North Vancouver
Member No.: 9223
No, you move.



So it turned into the F-35? Well THAT explains alot.

Mutter mutter, liberal mutter mutter biased muttering mutter mutter.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Panzer4life
post 29 Dec 2012, 16:43
Post #21



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 266
Joined: 9 January 2012
Member No.: 8935



I wish Russia could get the Topol-M in 1.82, but I think that is coming out in 2.0. :/ Be nice to have to counter ECA Pandora. However, My question is how is venom going to be better than Manticore or Pandora protocol, its just another infantry unit. (And let the flame war begin!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GeneralCamo
post 29 Dec 2012, 16:43
Post #22


That person
Group Icon

Group: Project Leader
Posts: 1425
Joined: 20 September 2009
From: Cyberspace
Member No.: 417
C&C ShockWave Co-Leader



Ask the EALA devs about their logic. The ROTR devs had nothing to od with it.


Offtopicness aside, perhaps a buff to the Tremor AGAS. Maybe 5%.


Venom argument
My best argument for it is that it will be similar to Volkov in the Red Alert mission, Soviet Soldier Volkov and Chizkoi. Basically, volkov is a cyborg, immune to every single weapon in the game, able to instantly kill buildings, tanks, and infantry, and had absolutely no counter. Venom might be similar, but will probably have a weakness.

This post has been edited by Generalcamo: 29 Dec 2012, 16:45
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Knjaz.
post 29 Dec 2012, 17:05
Post #23



Group Icon

Group: Tester
Posts: 1833
Joined: 29 May 2012
Member No.: 9155



QUOTE (Generalcamo @ 29 Dec 2012, 17:43) *
Offtopicness aside, perhaps a buff to the Tremor AGAS. Maybe 5%.


Well, I proposed the same thing yesterday, after looking into super weapons and their actual capability to engage different types of targets. Although, I didn't run proper tests - only tested with USA missile defense buildings placed in Cross pattern, and SDZs on the edge of SW radius.

Got an answer that Tremor is not supposed to have firepower of a SCUD storm (not counting in Toxins here or the amount of cash GLA can get from using it, just raw firepower.) So yeah, it seems Russia is going to stay with slightly weaker superweapon that is not as good at taking on defenses/secondary eco/small but fortified units/buildings.

QUOTE (Generalcamo @ 29 Dec 2012, 17:43) *
Venom argument
My best argument for it is that it will be similar to Volkov in the Red Alert mission, Soviet Soldier Volkov and Chizkoi. Basically, volkov is a cyborg, immune to every single weapon in the game, able to instantly kill buildings, tanks, and infantry, and had absolutely no counter. Venom might be similar, but will probably have a weakness.


I sometimes wish Aleksandr would've revived that project, in addition to Tesla technology biggrin.gif
Not going to happen, though.

This post has been edited by Knjaz.: 29 Dec 2012, 17:11
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
__CrUsHeR
post 29 Dec 2012, 17:13
Post #24



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2642
Joined: 18 April 2012
From: Southern Brazil.
Member No.: 9084
"No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise."



QUOTE (Panzer4life @ 29 Dec 2012, 13:43) *
I wish Russia could get the Topol-M in 1.82, but I think that is coming out in 2.0. :/ Be nice to have to counter ECA Pandora. However, My question is how is venom going to be better than Manticore or Pandora protocol, its just another infantry unit. (And let the flame war begin!)


It was said earlier that Venom will not be actually an infantry unit, it is considered a vehicle.

I believe this protocol will bring some benefit to the infantry, perhaps exo-suits for everyone! awbot.gif


--------------------

You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nonchalant Gener...
post 29 Dec 2012, 17:15
Post #25



Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: 8 July 2012
From: Hong Kong
Member No.: 9218
Ingenious indeed, but mildly impossible



Claymore . Blasting enemy denfenses apart and let the Manticore finish the job
The current ECA just doesn't feel like an artillery-centric faction without a heavy SPG with howitzers
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 12 June 2024 - 20:11