Rise of the Reds Update: Defiance |
Rise of the Reds Update: Defiance |
30 Mar 2014, 13:10
Post
#26
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 392 Joined: 19 May 2013 From: Mountains of Asia Member No.: 9942 |
OH NIZE.
YOU CAN EAT CR@P FOR ALL I CARE, ALEKSI! Nice to see a stable element in the Russian Army. I wonder what would the other Rus general feel about this, seeing that he hasn't been in the limelight for a while now. -------------------- |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 13:59
Post
#27
|
|
Queen Elizabeth-class Battleship Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 26 March 2013 From: With Kongou Member No.: 9874 Hello, Admire-ral! |
Russian Topol-M Nukes. These miniature SCUD Storms give the middle finger to those damn turtling Europeans. \\ __\\ ____________________________________ /
QUOTE (General Vasily Zhukov, to General Charles Cutting, with his Claymores and Howitzer Positions) You're not the ONLY one with far-range artillery. Let's see who has the last laugh now.
This post has been edited by Karpath: 30 Mar 2014, 14:05 |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 15:03
Post
#28
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 14 March 2013 Member No.: 9854 |
QUOTE You will be extremely sorry for this insolence. Keep that in mind for the rest of your worthless, pathetic life! This villian is so cliche that it's amusing.
|
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 16:35
Post
#29
|
|
Group: Project Leader Posts: 5870 Joined: 2 June 2009 Member No.: 10 |
No one ever said he wasn't; or for that matter, any of the other characters. This irregular update-based mode of presentation makes it impractical to have too much complexity or nuance since most people still come for the gameplay content. The story will always be a side element to provide some narrative context for the gameplay experience and some light military-themed entertainment. As a result, characters, motivations and events have to be painted in broad strokes to keep things fluent and comprehensible without extensive infodumbs. Plus, just because something is playing with clichés doesn't mean it's bad; this whole 'cheese played straight' shtick was part of what made RA1 so entertaining and memorable back in its day.
|
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 17:46
Post
#30
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2642 Joined: 18 April 2012 From: Southern Brazil. Member No.: 9084 "No. Not even in the face of Armageddon. Never compromise." |
I was missing the traditional updates, although it is still fun to watch the streams.
It's nice to know a little more about how is the man behind the mask... the idiot Alek took a real moral lesson. -------------------- You already imagined how would be SAP in the ROTR's universe? Check out this fan-fiction: South American Pact Introduction |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 17:57
Post
#31
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 791 Joined: 15 January 2013 Member No.: 9643 |
No one ever said he wasn't; or for that matter, any of the other characters. This irregular update-based mode of presentation makes it impractical to have too much complexity or nuance since most people still come for the gameplay content. The story will always be a side element to provide some narrative context for the gameplay experience and some light military-themed entertainment. As a result, characters, motivations and events have to be painted in broad strokes to keep things fluent and comprehensible without extensive infodumbs. Plus, just because something is playing with clichés doesn't mean it's bad; this whole 'cheese played straight' shtick was part of what made RA1 so entertaining and memorable back in its day. I don't see why you felt the need to explain that cliche =/= bad when that's exactly what the guy was saying. |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 18:21
Post
#32
|
|
Group: Project Leader Posts: 5870 Joined: 2 June 2009 Member No.: 10 |
I wasn't trying to be defensive or anything. I merely wanted to point out that we openly acknowledge the cliched nature of the ROTR story and provide a little insight into our rationale behind it, i.e. why we're presenting the story in the way we do, what we're trying to convey with it and what it's like to work with this kind of unconventional medium in practice, the challenges that may arise from it, the problems we're trying to avoid, etc.
|
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 18:50
Post
#33
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1863 Joined: 17 April 2012 Member No.: 9081 |
So all this means that Russia have such amount of nukes that it can destroy whole C&C Generals,but it is well aware of its power
so never actually relies on that kind of warfare ? While China simply doesn't follow same ethical codex as rest of the world (kind of highly charicaturized exaggerated version of their RL counterpart). |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 18:55
Post
#34
|
|
Group: Project Leader Posts: 5870 Joined: 2 June 2009 Member No.: 10 |
China had an in-universe 'excuse' to use nukes during the Global War On Terror because the GLA nuked them first, thus prompting the Party leadership to authorise retaliatory use of their own nukes as part of the PRC's RL 'no first use' policy.
|
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 19:04
Post
#35
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1863 Joined: 17 April 2012 Member No.: 9081 |
China had an in-universe 'excuse' to use nukes during the Global War On Terror because the GLA nuked them first, thus prompting the Party leadership to authorise retaliatory use of their own nukes as part of the PRC's RL 'no first use' policy. Yeah I understand that,but I was also thinking about China at the time of ROTR,deploying Nukeneers,Nuclear Hans... Weapons that didn't saw use during GWOT.I know those are like stated earlier localized smaller TNs,but again China have real guts just to throw them like ain't no thing,meaning that they definitely have different ethical codex,or they simply use excuse you mentioned for anything they think they should obliterate. |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 20:00
Post
#36
|
|
Group: Administrator Posts: 5732 Joined: 31 May 2009 From: The Netherlands Member No.: 1 Projects: SWR Productions Bitch slapping SAGE since 2003 |
^ China never saw any real action durring the storyline yet but when they do they too have a legitimate reason to do so
-------------------- |
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 21:05
Post
#37
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1863 Joined: 17 April 2012 Member No.: 9081 |
Aha,so that means that all of Chinese nuclear weapons we are using in skirmish are for show in lore...For now.
|
|
|
30 Mar 2014, 22:16
Post
#38
|
|
I fits I sits Group: Members Posts: 532 Joined: 18 August 2010 From: Wirral, United Kingdom Member No.: 1107 |
Nice update, I wonder if the magnitude of Aleksandr's coming atrocity will be what he was trying to do...
|
|
|
31 Mar 2014, 11:57
Post
#39
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 256 Joined: 21 October 2009 From: Between Europe and Asia. Member No.: 500 |
Nice update, I wonder if the magnitude of Aleksandr's coming atrocity will be what he was trying to do... I really hope he's to be arrested by the President Suvorov as 1. He (Aleks) already accomplished his initial mission to start the war, 2. I'm sure he's getting noticed by the President for his unstable psychological condition and inability to properly command large scale operations and 3. With that mistakes he has negative effects on President's rating among own military and probably civilian population too. So my assumption is that once Aleks discovers about his arrest, he'll try to seize the control over the Kremlin. Chances are high that he'll fail and while escaping he'll try to turn himself over to GLA or even China or even go rogue against everyone. Kinda reminds me of madman Yuri during RA2 and RA2:YR. We'll see. This post has been edited by blgmgl: 31 Mar 2014, 11:58 |
|
|
31 Mar 2014, 13:35
Post
#40
|
|
BANNED Group: Members Posts: 728 Joined: 7 June 2009 From: Spain Member No.: 48 |
I really hope he's to be arrested by the President Suvorov as 1. He (Aleks) already accomplished his initial mission to start the war, 2. I'm sure he's getting noticed by the President for his unstable psychological condition and inability to properly command large scale operations and 3. With that mistakes he has negative effects on President's rating among own military and probably civilian population too. So my assumption is that once Aleks discovers about his arrest, he'll try to seize the control over the Kremlin. Chances are high that he'll fail and while escaping he'll try to turn himself over to GLA or even China or even go rogue against everyone. Kinda reminds me of madman Yuri during RA2 and RA2:YR. i think the said no "civil wars" in the storyline so i dont think Alex will go against the rest of russia (it will be a short campaing for him anyway) Suvorov probably has some fear if Alex spill the beans over the falseflag operation than started the war, if he spills them, i wont be surprise if China goes for Russia -------------------- |
|
|
31 Mar 2014, 13:41
Post
#41
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 676 Joined: 19 June 2013 From: Saudi Arabia Member No.: 9986 |
One of the best stories, felt like with them.
i got a big hunch that eventually in one of the later missions Aleksandr is gonna go rogue and kill LOTS of people before going down. (if he goes down, he probably just disappear in mysterious events) -------------------- "He who heard is not like he who saw"
|
|
|
31 Mar 2014, 15:46
Post
#42
|
|
Queen Elizabeth-class Battleship Group: Members Posts: 320 Joined: 26 March 2013 From: With Kongou Member No.: 9874 Hello, Admire-ral! |
I really hope he's to be arrested by the President Suvorov as 1. He (Aleks) already accomplished his initial mission to start the war, 2. I'm sure he's getting noticed by the President for his unstable psychological condition and inability to properly command large scale operations and 3. With that mistakes he has negative effects on President's rating among own military and probably civilian population too. So my assumption is that once Aleks discovers about his arrest, he'll try to seize the control over the Kremlin. Chances are high that he'll fail and while escaping he'll try to turn himself over to GLA or even China or even go rogue against everyone. Kinda reminds me of madman Yuri during RA2 and RA2:YR. We'll see. I was thinking that the last mission for the campaign would be the traitorous General Aleksandr (probably with the GLA to make things fair for Aleksandr) vs ECA (most likely as an auxiliary force of General Wilhelm and General Charles) and the Russian Federation (most probably as General Zhukov, with auxiliary reinforcements from General Orlov), with auxiliary US and/or Chinese (I'm thinking General Chen or Mau) reinforcements. I was also imagining Aleksandr as the "final boss" where you have to micromanage Frank Jaeger, Boris and possibly the Venoms to defeat General Aleksandr, but that will make it too cliche. This post has been edited by Karpath: 31 Mar 2014, 15:47 |
|
|
31 Mar 2014, 20:33
Post
#43
|
|
Comrade Bear Group: Dev. Team Posts: 954 Joined: 3 February 2013 Member No.: 9722 Projects: Deep Impact |
I was thinking that the last mission for the campaign would be the traitorous General Aleksandr (probably with the GLA to make things fair for Aleksandr) vs ECA (most likely as an auxiliary force of General Wilhelm and General Charles) and the Russian Federation (most probably as General Zhukov, with auxiliary reinforcements from General Orlov), with auxiliary US and/or Chinese (I'm thinking General Chen or Mau) reinforcements. I was also imagining Aleksandr as the "final boss" where you have to micromanage Frank Jaeger, Boris and possibly the Venoms to defeat General Aleksandr, but that will make it too cliche. Nah, it'd probably be more like "Send in Frank Jaeger/Boris to sabotage/destroy the power to allow our forces to get in." This post has been edited by Karpet: 31 Mar 2014, 20:34 -------------------- Your feeling of helplessness is your best friend, savage.
|
|
|
1 Apr 2014, 3:23
Post
#44
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 77 Joined: 17 December 2012 From: Good Ole' USA Member No.: 9536 Call the Ball |
Well, thankfully this isn't real life. Use of tactical nuclear weapons by the Russians would be responded in kind by the US in accordance with NATO. Even in this verse, with the abrigation of NATO, I think the US would still react the same way in defense of Europe. Given that the US had modernized it's arsenal as well, Russia would have to deal with Midgetmen, AGM-129s from B-2s and SRAM IIs from B-1Bs and GLCMs. Would be fun to see a Nuclear Option protocol for US Generals. Bombing runs use nuclear weapons (B-52 would use a gravity bomb, even though it can launch nuke cruise missiles, B-1B would use multiple SRAM IIs and the B-2 would launch AGM-129s, a stealth bomber launching stealth nukes), Tomahawk Launchers would use nuclear payloads and the particle cannon would turn into a Midgetman launch site.
This post has been edited by TornadoADV: 1 Apr 2014, 3:24 |
|
|
1 Apr 2014, 4:50
Post
#45
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 650 Joined: 1 March 2014 Member No.: 10319 |
So... Zhukov's answer to incompetent teammates: CTRL+LEFT CLICK on Command Center.
-------------------- And then...
|
|
|
1 Apr 2014, 17:00
Post
#46
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2492 Joined: 20 December 2012 From: My mother's womb Member No.: 9540 |
Wait a minute... No ROTR april fools update this year?!
-------------------- |
|
|
1 Apr 2014, 17:20
Post
#47
|
|
Secure, Contain, Protect Group: Members Posts: 467 Joined: 23 June 2013 From: USA Member No.: 9992 |
Wait a minute... No ROTR april fools update this year?! maybe it was because lots of people didn't get that it was a joke last year. -------------------- |
|
|
1 Apr 2014, 18:07
Post
#48
|
|
Group: Project Leader Posts: 5870 Joined: 2 June 2009 Member No.: 10 |
Or maybe it's because we just couldn't think of a fun premise, so we simply decided not to have an April Fools gimmick this year instead of pulling some lame, contrived throwaway gag out of our collective arse
|
|
|
1 Apr 2014, 20:45
Post
#49
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 650 Joined: 1 March 2014 Member No.: 10319 |
Or maybe it's because we just couldn't think of a fun premise, so we simply decided not to have an April Fools gimmick this year instead of pulling some lame, contrived throwaway gag out of our collective arse Your photo counts. Line and salute! -------------------- And then...
|
|
|
1 Apr 2014, 21:04
Post
#50
|
|
I fits I sits Group: Members Posts: 532 Joined: 18 August 2010 From: Wirral, United Kingdom Member No.: 1107 |
Or maybe it's because we just couldn't think of a fun premise, so we simply decided not to have an April Fools gimmick this year instead of pulling some lame, contrived throwaway gag out of our collective arse You could have done a Doritos and Mountain Dew themed one. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29 May 2024 - 9:13 |